From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFD2D6EEA3
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 18:30:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9D43D1DAD8
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 18:30:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
[94.136.29.106])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id BE5A31DAC8
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 18:30:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8C68443A6E
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 18:30:35 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <03cd9b76-a623-4c4f-01a0-4282b028abb8@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 18:30:30 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:92.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/92.0
Content-Language: en-GB
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
Lorenz Stechauner <l.stechauner@proxmox.com>
References: <20210803121640.2530993-1-l.stechauner@proxmox.com>
<20210803121640.2530993-3-l.stechauner@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210803121640.2530993-3-l.stechauner@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL 1.455 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
NICE_REPLY_A -2.24 Looks like a legit reply (A)
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH v3 storage 1/3] status: move unlink from
http-server to enpoint
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 16:30:39 -0000
On 03/08/2021 14:16, Lorenz Stechauner wrote:
> this is the first step in which not the http server removes the
> temporary file, but the worker itself.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenz Stechauner <l.stechauner@proxmox.com>
> ---
> PVE/API2/Storage/Status.pm | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/PVE/API2/Storage/Status.pm b/PVE/API2/Storage/Status.pm
> index b838461..a5ac372 100644
> --- a/PVE/API2/Storage/Status.pm
> +++ b/PVE/API2/Storage/Status.pm
> @@ -486,6 +486,7 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method ({
> print "command: " . join(' ', @$cmd) . "\n";
>
> eval { run_command($cmd, errmsg => 'import failed'); };
> + unlink $tmpfilename or warn "unable to clean up temporary file '$tmpfilename' - $!";
and doesn't this have the same issues as you recently fixed in regards to the node
not being the local one and thus ssh/scp being used?
> if (my $err = $@) {
> eval { $err_cleanup->() };
> warn "$@" if $@;
>