From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <chris@itg.uy> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC14A6373C for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 16:28:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D96B92F4B7 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 16:28:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail1.protonmail.ch (mail1.protonmail.ch [185.70.40.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id DD26C2F4AD for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 16:28:08 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 14:27:57 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=itg.uy; s=protonmail2; t=1600784882; bh=J4yIYNpaz2Lr2pkZ3huK7WzmCXJi/Y+Y+v17MJUOmTY=; h=Date:To:From:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=wnt8o7BclQzz3HGpga0fZs+rXhDvJzpISEsaYNyujqDl8A5PVyR33GAsyzB34XnnO AefFpFpvEkMK8UsNJwnEhdW3tPhJKwJsPiQGHRbumD7YXHkarPvQUaNTM+wcJu3ljC aefITmgAw7I9+8l8+G3HKSXdrsLUsjgKDDaQbHr87frGQfVb7UEK93oW678bS6vFxw u3DSfunAGKc9o1JIRAR6MxO+pQ9Cl6b7u5uVOmGXe1+UzOPzEHO+92CO3YggPgBaqz c0iOK5Ozq4Gj7QTHzEb++iD87nmchweIZFgPyg+K493bt75qRhdhob/dKfTm1E5my7 sjLvwdwE5oEng== To: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> From: Chris Sutcliff <chris@itg.uy> Reply-To: Chris Sutcliff <chris@itg.uy> Message-ID: <-tU3l9BkQ8HNr8tHOj3wmlWtVePc_6tUtIwMKP0XWrmMtHppcGEiwH24ELvWkyfI-XMLmbUH0VxMdWqE6NX7MJpBPA3IrxLvMsaS8R4KJ9E=@itg.uy> In-Reply-To: <0eca6cfc-96c5-ab78-1dea-0e2dc2f043b7@marcobertorello.it> References: <0eca6cfc-96c5-ab78-1dea-0e2dc2f043b7@marcobertorello.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on mailout.protonmail.ch X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.401 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS 0.8 Spam that uses ascii formatting tricks RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 0.001 Good reputation (+3) RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL 0.001 Mailspike good senders SPF_HELO_PASS -0.001 SPF: HELO matches SPF record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [itg.uy, marcobertorello.it, proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [PVE-User] New Mobile App X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 14:28:40 -0000 I would also love to check this out but I have exactly the same issue. Please allow us to specify our own port! If we put ":443" on the end of the= URL it still automatically adds ":8006" on the end making it "<url>:443:80= 06" Kind Regards Chris Sutcliff Sutcliff Limited =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 Original Me= ssage =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 On Tuesday, September 22, 2020 3:18 PM, Bertorello, Marco <me@marcobertorel= lo.it> wrote: > Hi PVE users, great news: > > https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/new-mobile-app-for-proxmox-ve.76317/ > > Unfortunately, I cannot test this app because my servers are behind a > reverse proxy running on standard 443/HTTPS port, while for the app > https and :8006 are implied. > > I hope this will change in future, the app seems very cool! > > Best regards, > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------------------------------------------------ > > Marco Bertorello > https://www.marcobertorello.it > > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user